Skip to content

Archive for July, 2011


Stay away from Google and Google+ if you value your privacy

A Network World editor who normally writes about Microsoft has chronicled several alarming tales which describe how the Monster of Mountain View is taking its data-mining to the next level. Here’s story one:

For a few months, whenever this editor used Google search, Google would show him relevant tweets from people he was following on his Twitter account within search results. But, he never actually gave Google his Twitter handle. In fact, it would always ask him to verify his Twitter name even as it served up the Tweets. Google was guessing about his Twitter identity, probably using the fact that the editor gave Twitter his Gmail account. Google saw messages from that Twitter account coming into his Gmail, correlated the two and started serving up unasked for Tweets. Yes, Google is correlating your Google profile with data from public social networks. You must opt out if you want it to cut it out.

Story two:

As for my story, a couple of weeks ago I fired up my Gmail and noticed my name with a little “plus” sign at the top. It turns out it was a Google+ account and Google had filled what it could of my public profile with the data I had shared when I tried out Buzz. This was not my full real name but the name I had been using with all my Google accounts. No one I knew was on Plus yet, so a few days later, I returned, found a few co-workers and tried to post a “hello world” status update. I got an error message. The message didn’t tell me I was banned … it simply said that it couldn’t post my status at this time and I should try again later. Which I did, several times … to the same effect.

After trying everything I could think of, I thought Plus was either ridiculously hard to use or just plain broken (when in truth, the answer was neither, as my account had been suspended).

A few days later, when it still wasn’t fixed, I tried to update my profile and when I hit save, I was finally told what the problem was. It didn’t like my name. I was told the account was being investigated for possible violations for Google’s profile policies.

Story three:

So I posted a photo. I was horrified to discover that although I had set the privacy settings on my photos to default to be visible only to specific circles, the photo was marked as publicly visible. No amount of searching or clicking would get Google to declare that photo not public. I was even more horrified to discover that the photo somehow geolocated itself to the exact location it was taken … which is amazingly creepy as it was taken on a trail in a state park on the iPhone of a friend and sent as a text to my Android phone.

What Julie (the author of the above stories) calls “watching” or “correlating”, we call data-mining. Data-mining is the harmful, invasive activity that underpins pretty much Google’s entire business model. Data-mining means stitching together publicly-available information about people with information that people have volunteered to either Google or its partners at some point to create nearly complete profiles. The commercial purpose of the profiles is to make it possible to serve up behavioral advertising.

Google believes that by destroying the privacy of billions of people, it can reap more than a tidy profit. Its settings to allow people to opt out are just a sop to pacify people who would be otherwise critical of the company.

Google knows it doesn’t have any chance of mollifying its real critics. But right now, it’s not too concerned about this since it has more (deluded) fans than critics.

As long as Google can get away with quietly encroaching upon people’s privacy and making loss of privacy the new norm, it will.

Google chairman Eric Schmidt has already admitted that the Monster of Mountain View has developed facial recognition technology it hasn’t released because it is too creepy. But of course, that research hasn’t been destroyed. It’s still there. Google could start putting this technology into its Picasa offering anytime it wanted – or create new offerings that use it. It’s likely only a matter of time before that happens.


Microsoft skewers Google’s Gmail for insensivity to privacy with parody video

Microsoft may not be a privacy watchdog, but somebody inside the company definitely agrees with us that Gmail is creepy:

On July 20 during the MGX opening sessions, the Softies showed off their “Gmail Man” spoof, meant to spur the troops selling Office 365 against Google Apps, and specifically, Gmail. In the video, Gmail man riffles through mail to find keywords for serving up ads. The message: Google cares more about advertising revenues than privacy.

ZDNet’s Mary Jo Foley couldn’t get Microsoft to confirm that the video is legit. But it seems to be. It would have more credibility coming from an organization like Consumer Watchdog than a Google rival (in this case, Microsoft, which has its own free, ad-supported email service – Hotmail).

The video itself is well-done, and manages to be funny and sobering at the same time.


Google confirms it will forcibly make all Google Profiles public by the end of the month

Google is adopting another privacy-encroaching, opt-out, Facebook-style policy:

The purpose of Google Profiles is to enable you to manage your online identity. Today, nearly all Google Profiles are public. We believe that using Google Profiles to help people find and connect with you online is how the product is best used. Private profiles don’t allow this, so we have decided to require all profiles to be public.

Keep in mind that your full name and gender are the only required information that will be displayed on your profile; you’ll be able to edit or remove any other information that you don’t want to share.

If you currently have a private profile but you do not wish to make your profile public, you can delete your profile. Or, you can simply do nothing. All private profiles will be deleted after July 31, 2011.

What they really meant to say was that private profiles – and privacy in general, for that matter – just don’t fit in with their business model of monetizing people.

People who care about their privacy should stay away from Google’s offerings.

Our front page provides a pretty exhaustive guide which explains how users can Leave Google Behind. Many of the alternatives to Google’s products aren’t well known, which is why we’ve gone to the trouble of listing some of them. We encourage you to try them out for yourself. The Web’s a big place… discover how much fun it is to explore it without Google.